Search for: All records

Undergraduate mathematics classrooms are racialized spaces for Latin* students, even at Hispanic-Serving Institutions (HSIs) with educational missions of cultural affirmation. Instruction plays an important role in reinforcing and disrupting racial oppression in mathematics, which has significant implications for gateway courses (e.g., calculus) that impact STEM persistence. Groupwork is a widely-adopted practice in gateway mathematics courses with intentions to promote equitable access to content and participation; however, research has shown that groupwork can perpetuate inequitable experiences for historically marginalized groups in STEM, including Latin* students attending HSIs. The present study addresses these concerns of racial equity in undergraduate mathematics by exploring Latin* students’ groupwork experiences in gateway courses at a HSI. Our findings capture how groupwork facilitated or removed access to a sense of racially-affirming community, which was central in Latin* students’ visions of equitable support as mathematics learners at a HSI. 

Scholars and practitioners in higher education recognize that transformational change of organizations—especially departments and institutions—is difficult but essential to achieve needed, national-scale improvements in access, quality and equity in STEM instruction and career development. Based on studies of change projects in college mathematics education and gender equity on STEM faculties, we identify and describe a suite of common leadership approaches among change agents who led these projects. We propose that these approaches function as constructs for an emerging framework about change leadership. By observing how change agents lead complex change projects in higher education, we seek to develop theory about leadership for organizational change and to offer practical guidance to such leaders. 

In mathematics, counter narratives can be used to fight the dominant narrative of who is good at mathematics and who can succeed in mathematics. Eight mathematicians were recruited to co-author a larger NSF project (RAMP). In part, they were asked to create author stories for an undergraduate audience. In this article, we use narrative analysis to present five polarities identified in the author stories. We present various quotations from the mathematicians’ author stories to highlight their experiences with home and school life, view of what mathematics is, experiences in growth in mathematics, with collaboration, and their feelings of community in mathematics. The telling of these experiences contributes towards rehumanizing mathematics and rewriting the narrative of who is good at and who can succeed in mathematics. 

In this report, we share the design of a year-long professional development program for university math instructors that we developed and refined as the Anti-deficit Learning and Teaching Project (Adelante). The program is a community learning project wherein minoritized students, STEM peer mentors, and math instructors (graduate students and instructional faculty) build relationships as they share their knowledge and experiences with race, gender, and mathematics. Culturally relevant pedagogy (Ladson-Billing, 1995) frames the goals of the community learning in terms of deep mathematical knowledge, cultural knowledge, and sociopolitical consciousness. The program activities are inspired by the Funds of Knowledge for Teaching project (Moll et al., 1992) wherein teachers are offered opportunities to build meaningful relationships with students and their communities. An anti-deficit perspective (Adiredja et al., 2020) guides the learning experience for all participants. Not only are minoritized students assumed to have cultural and intellectual assets for learning, but the project also aims to dismantle deficit master narratives (Solórzano & Yosso, 2002) about these students and their capacity to learn. Instructors worked on explicitly challenging deficit narratives about their students as they engaged in the program’s activities. The project also takes an anti-deficit approach to instructor development, focusing on their individual growth and agency, joy in teaching, and mental health. We also position ourselves as learners to the experience and wisdom of the staff and students at the university cultural centers. The core activities for the PD engage teachers to: (a) participate in five PD meetings on anti- deficit teaching and Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) teaching method; (b) lead a five-day math summer bridge workshop in Pre-Calculus, Calculus I, II, Vector Calculus, or Linear Algebra immediately following the meetings; (c) participate in critical conversations about race and gender in STEM with students at the cultural centers; (d) conduct a semi-structure interview with one of their students from the summer workshop about their STEM experience; and (e) participate in group reflection meetings debriefing their experience in the activities. Preliminary analysis of two of the three cohorts of participants found that most instructors developed a more humanizing approach to their teaching and their students (Gutiérrez, 2018). IBL helped instructors to explicitly challenge deficit narratives about minoritized students in the classroom, wherein most observed their students engaging in deep mathematical reasoning. Interviewing one of their students also shifted deficit narratives that developed in the classroom for some instructors. The workshop served as a space to try out previously learned teaching ideas (student centered teaching) without constraints from curriculum and assessments. Doing so reinvigorated many instructors’ passion for teaching, especially those who are more experienced. 

Teaching mathematics for future elementary teachers is fundamentally different from other forms of mathematics and thus requires different knowledge. As community colleges become increasingly involved in the process of training future teachers, it is essential to explore how instructors at these institutions develop as mathematics teacher educators. This paper reports on a preliminary exploration of how community college faculty grappled with teaching-oriented mathematical tasks involving fractions. Choices of mathematical representation, selection of answer before and after discussion, and overall themes are discussed, with a focus on development of mathematical content knowledge for teaching. 

In this poster we illustrate how stewardship, a particular kind of leadership, in the complex system of mathematics instructional development requires decentering and interconnecting. This theory development for professional growth of faculty agents for change expands on earlier work describing how instructional practices used by providers of teaching-focused professional development in seminars about teaching (for graduate students) could be beneficial both for learning high-powered approaches to teaching of undergraduate mathematics and for building a foundation for future change-agent work. Here we move one level up and present an analogous argument about practices for stewards who are teaching about teaching about teaching. The poster illustrates the multilevel system with an expanded model that incorporates learning objectives for provider professional learning and the instructional practices of such professional learning in ways that showcase (and teach about) decentering and interconnecting. 

Teaching professional development (TPD) in collegiate mathematics has expanded over the last few decades. Providers of TPD, people who organize and facilitate professional learning about teaching, are at the center of this growth. Yet, little is known about who Providers are and what they do. To better understand the national landscape of Providers of TPD within university mathematics departments, this report shares data from a national survey where respondents were Providers. The focus here is on findings from survey questions asking about characteristics of Providers and the “providees” with whom they work, along with formats, topics, and activities used in TPD. Results suggest that Providers value active, learner-centered instructional methods promoted by research and policy. However, in the TPD itself, formats, topics, and activities commonly used by Providers may preach but not regularly practice activity-based methods.